GitLab

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, visualchemy.gallery can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a specifying that it is fictional, produced by AI, and created "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to widen his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to produce, king-wifi.win and it does, definitely in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we really indicate human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative functions need to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its best performing industries on the vague guarantee of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector disgaeawiki.info is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for oke.zone it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.