GitLab

U.S. Foreign Policy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for major conversation of American foreign policy and global affairs. The magazine has actually featured contributions from lots of prominent international affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://em-erables-horbourg-wihr.site.ac-strasbourg.fr). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint authorizations here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with a critical intelligence difficulty in its growing competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from World War II could no longer supply sufficient intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage stimulated an audacious moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In only a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering crucial intelligence, capturing images of Soviet rocket setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the global order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must take benefit of its first-rate economic sector and sufficient capability for innovation to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the country's sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The combination of artificial intelligence, particularly through big language models, offers groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more relevant assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation comes with considerable downsides, however, especially as adversaries make use of similar improvements to reveal and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to protect itself from enemies who may utilize the innovation for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security community, satisfying the pledge and managing the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a willingness to change the way firms work. The U.S. intelligence and military communities can harness the capacity of AI while mitigating its fundamental threats, ensuring that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a quickly progressing worldwide landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners around the globe, how the nation means to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's capacity to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to procedure and analyze huge amounts of data at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to analyze large quantities of gathered data to produce time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems' pattern recognition capabilities to determine and alert human analysts to possible threats, such as rocket launches or military movements, or essential global advancements that analysts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would make sure that vital warnings are timely, actionable, and relevant, enabling more reliable responses to both rapidly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which integrate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite images with could offer a detailed view of military motions, making it possible for faster and more precise danger evaluations and possibly brand-new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise unload repeated and lengthy jobs to devices to focus on the most fulfilling work: producing original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community's overall insights and efficiency. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence companies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language models have actually grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI's recently released o1 and o3 models showed considerable development in precision and thinking ability-and can be used to a lot more quickly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of non-English information could be capable of critical subtle differences in between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community might concentrate on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be hard to find, typically struggle to make it through the clearance process, yewiki.org and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would be able to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to choose the needles in the haystack that really matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can promptly sift through intelligence data sets, open-source details, and conventional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that analysts can then confirm and improve, making sure the final items are both detailed and accurate. Analysts might coordinate with an innovative AI assistant to overcome analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each version of their analyses and providing ended up intelligence quicker.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian center and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and a more 55,000 files kept on CDs, consisting of pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities positioned immense pressure on intelligence experts to produce detailed assessments of its material and whether it pointed to a continuous effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists several months-and numerous hours of labor-to equate each page, review it by hand for relevant material, and include that details into assessments. With today's AI capabilities, the first 2 actions in that procedure might have been achieved within days, perhaps even hours, allowing analysts to understand and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

Among the most interesting applications is the way AI could transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would enable users to ask specific concerns and get summed up, pertinent details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make notified decisions quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses many advantages, it also presents considerable new threats, especially as adversaries develop similar technologies. China's developments in AI, particularly in computer vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it does not have personal privacy constraints and civil liberty protections. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on huge amounts of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for numerous functions, such as monitoring and social control. The existence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software around the globe might offer China with ready access to bulk information, especially bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition designs, a particular concern in countries with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood need to consider how Chinese designs constructed on such extensive information sets can offer China a tactical advantage.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those produced by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users throughout the globe at fairly economical costs. Many of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using large language designs to rapidly generate and spread out incorrect and malicious material or to carry out cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, thereby increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence neighborhood's AI designs will become attractive targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being critical national possessions that should be safeguarded against foes seeking to jeopardize or manipulate them. The intelligence neighborhood need to invest in developing secure AI designs and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and constant assessment to safeguard against potential risks. These teams can use AI to mimic attacks, discovering potential weak points and developing strategies to reduce them. Proactive measures, including cooperation with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These obstacles can not be wished away. Waiting too wish for AI innovations to fully mature carries its own threats; U.S. intelligence capacities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going full steam ahead in developing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive cautions or longer-term tactical insight-continues to be an advantage for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence community needs to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services need to quickly master making use of AI innovations and make AI a foundational element in their work. This is the only sure method to ensure that future U.S. presidents receive the very best possible intelligence support, remain ahead of their foes, and secure the United States' sensitive abilities and operations. Implementing these changes will need a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence analysts mainly develop items from raw intelligence and data, with some support from existing AI models for voice and imagery analysis. Progressing, intelligence authorities need to check out consisting of a hybrid technique, in line with existing laws, using AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available information and refined with classified details. This amalgam of innovation and conventional intelligence gathering could lead to an AI entity offering direction to images, signals, open source, and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of regular and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automatic voice translation.

To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders should champion the benefits of AI integration, emphasizing the improved abilities and effectiveness it uses. The cadre of newly selected chief AI officers has been established in U.S. intelligence and defense to act as leads within their firms for promoting AI innovation and getting rid of barriers to the technology's execution. Pilot projects and early wins can build momentum and confidence in AI's capabilities, motivating more comprehensive adoption. These officers can utilize the expertise of nationwide labs and other partners to check and improve AI models, ensuring their efficiency and security. To institutionalize change, leaders need to produce other organizational incentives, consisting of promos and training opportunities, to reward innovative methods and those staff members and systems that show reliable use of AI.

The White House has created the policy needed for using AI in nationwide security companies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, safe and secure, and reliable AI detailed the assistance needed to fairly and securely utilize the technology, and National Security Memorandum 25, released in October 2024, is the nation's foundational method for utilizing the power and managing the threats of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are required for departments and firms to produce the facilities needed for development and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to invest in examination capabilities to ensure that the United States is constructing reliable and high-performing AI innovations.

Intelligence and military communities are dedicated to keeping people at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually developed the structures and tools to do so. Agencies will need standards for how their experts ought to utilize AI designs to make certain that intelligence products meet the intelligence community's requirements for dependability. The federal government will also require to maintain clear guidance for dealing with the data of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and usage of large language designs. It will be very important to balance making use of emerging technologies with securing the personal privacy and civil liberties of residents. This means enhancing oversight mechanisms, upgrading pertinent structures to reflect the capabilities and risks of AI, and fostering a culture of AI development within the nationwide security device that harnesses the capacity of the technology while protecting the rights and freedoms that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the forefront of overhead and satellite images by developing a number of the key innovations itself, winning the AI race will need that neighborhood to reimagine how it partners with private industry. The economic sector, which is the main methods through which the government can recognize AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research, data centers, and computing power. Given those companies' developments, intelligence agencies should focus on leveraging commercially available AI designs and refining them with categorized information. This technique allows the intelligence neighborhood to rapidly expand its capabilities without having to start from scratch, enabling it to remain competitive with adversaries. A recent cooperation between NASA and IBM to produce the world's biggest geospatial structure model-and the subsequent release of the design to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this kind of public-private collaboration can operate in practice.

As the nationwide security community integrates AI into its work, it must guarantee the security and durability of its designs. Establishing standards to release generative AI firmly is essential for maintaining the integrity of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's new AI Security Center and its collaboration with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States faces growing competition to form the future of the worldwide order, it is urgent that its intelligence companies and military profit from the nation's development and leadership in AI, focusing particularly on big language models, to supply faster and more appropriate details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight needed to browse a more complex, competitive, and content-rich world.