GitLab

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be enabled to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment lawyer who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM's postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don't consider it a lot an offer. I think it's a demand to resign with an unclear pledge that, possibly, Employment you might be kept in administrative leave status for employment as much as eight months - but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is since there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not describe it as a buyout. I believe that's a really deceptive term to use in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there's normally some sort of written contract or a concrete offer to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe care. There are no assurances included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for specific is that if you alter your mind, the company's most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially giving up control over a lot.MARTIN: employment Exists some classification of worker who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most cautious due to the fact that leaving earlier than intended can have serious consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told that this is a good offer for individuals who do not want to return to the workplace. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is extremely generously offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a method, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it's developed to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I believe it's attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people's eyes since there are no guarantees. And these are people who enjoy their job. They like the objective of the agency. They work hard. And today, they're dealing with extremely tough choices, especially if they're remote. I suggest, it's very coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you expect legal obstacles simply to the offer itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to figure out what to do with it. I'm unsure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I'm not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to order firms to offer this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is extremely much perhaps setting the stage for difficulties due to the fact that I feel OPM has greatly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work legal representative with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for signing up with us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our site terms of usage and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further details.

NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text may not remain in its final kind and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might differ. The authoritative record of NPR's shows is the audio record.