GitLab

For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my extremely own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, ai but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to broaden his variety, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative functions must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing markets on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them accredit their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public data from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their with the US government before they are released.

But this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and akropolistravel.com are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, asteroidsathome.net and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm unsure how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.